Gingival Graft Techniques Compared: Free Gingival, Pedicle, and Connective Tissue Grafts Explained

Mar 05, 2025Mr. Bur

Gingival recession is a widespread challenge in periodontal practice, exposing roots, causing sensitivity, and compromising aesthetics. Dentists worldwide rely on soft tissue grafting to address these issues, with 3 primary techniques standing out: free gingival grafts (FGG)pedicle grafts, and connective tissue grafts (CTG). Each method offers unique advantages, indications, and challenges. In this guide, we’ll compare these approaches, focusing on free gingival grafts, while providing practical insights to help clinicians choose the best option for their patients.

What is Free Gingival Graft?

Mr. Bur Gingivectomy Kit ensures precise tissue removal and contouring for free gingival graft procedures, enhancing soft tissue grafting success and periodontal health.

free gingival graft involves harvesting a piece of keratinized tissue, typically from the palate, and transplanting it to a recession site without maintaining a vascular connection. Introduced in the 1960s, this technique prioritizes increasing the width and thickness of attached gingiva over aesthetic root coverage. It’s a straightforward, predictable procedure favored for its ability to reinforce thin or receding gums.

Comparing the 3 Techniques

Mr. Bur Gingivectomy Kit supports precise soft tissue removal for free gingival grafts, pedicle grafts, and connective tissue grafts, enhancing periodontal surgical outcomes.

Here’s how free gingival grafts stack up against pedicle grafts and connective tissue grafts across key aspects:

1. Indications

  1. Free Gingival Graft (FGG)

    • Best for: Patients with inadequate keratinized tissue (<1 mm), Miller Class I or II recession, or implant sites needing soft tissue support.

    • Goal: Enhances gingival thickness and stability, not primarily root coverage.

  2. Pedicle Graft

    • Best for: Miller Class I or II recession with sufficient adjacent keratinized tissue.

    • Goal: Covers exposed roots aesthetically while leveraging nearby tissue.

  3. Connective Tissue Graft (CTG)

    • Best for: Miller Class I or II recession needing root coverage and aesthetic improvement.

    • Goal: Combines root coverage with keratinized tissue augmentation.

2. Surgical Technique

  1. Free Gingival Graft (FGG)

    • Process: A full-thickness graft is harvested from the palate, the recipient site is debrided (e.g., with tools like Mr. Bur’s Degranulation Kit), and the graft is sutured over the prepared bed.

    • Key Step: Precision trimming of the donor tissue (aided by tools like Mr. Bur’s Soft Tissue Trimming Bur) ensures a uniform fit.

    • Duration: 45-60 minutes, depending on site complexity.

  2. Pedicle Graft

    • Process: A partial-thickness flap is created from adjacent tissue, rotated or advanced (e.g., coronally advanced flap), and sutured over the root without a second donor site.

    • Key Step: Site prep with degranulation tools ensures a clean bed for flap adhesion.

    • Duration: 30-45 minutes, faster due to no separate harvesting.

  3. Connective Tissue Graft (CTG)

    • Process: Subepithelial tissue is harvested from the palate, placed under a recipient flap, and sutured for root coverage. The Gingivectomy Kit can refine flap contours.

    • Key Step: Root surface conditioning (e.g., with EDTA) enhances attachment.

    • Duration: 60-90 minutes, longer due to dual-site surgery.

3. Healing and Recovery

  1. Free Gingival Graft (FGG)

    • Timeline: Clot forms in 24-48 hours; full integration by 6-8 weeks.

    • Patient Experience: Moderate palatal discomfort; requires careful post-op care (no brushing for 2-3 weeks).

    • Outcome: Thick, stable gingiva with a slightly patchwork appearance.

  2. Pedicle Graft

    • Timeline: Rapid revascularization (1-2 weeks); full healing by 4-6 weeks.

    • Patient Experience: Minimal discomfort since there’s no second site; swelling subsides quickly.

    • Outcome: Seamless integration with excellent aesthetics.

  3. Connective Tissue Graft (CTG)

    • Timeline: Initial adhesion in 48 hours; maturation by 6+ weeks.

    • Patient Experience: Palatal soreness manageable with NSAIDs; dual-site healing.

    • Outcome: Superior root coverage and natural gingival contour.


4. Advantages

  • Free Gingival Graft (FGG): Predictable keratinized tissue gain; durable for high-risk areas; no reliance on adjacent tissue.

  • Pedicle Graft: Faster healing due to retained blood supply; no donor site morbidity; aesthetically pleasing.

  • Connective Tissue Graft (CTG): Gold standard for root coverage; balances aesthetics and function; long-term stability (90%+ success rate).

5. Limitations

  • Free Gingival Graft (FGG): Palatal donor site discomfort; less aesthetic due to color mismatch; not ideal for extensive root coverage.

  • Pedicle Graft: Requires sufficient nearby tissue; risk of flap relapse if tensioned; limited to localized recession.

  • Connective Tissue Graft (CTG): Technically demanding; dual-site surgery increases complexity and recovery time.

Why Choose Free Gingival Grafts?

Free gingival grafts shine when the priority is fortifying the gingiva rather than covering roots aesthetically. Dentists in regions like Southeast Asia, where thin biotypes are common, or in implant-heavy practices in Europe, often turn to FGG for its reliability. The procedure’s simplicity—once mastered—makes it accessible even in resource-limited settings, provided proper tools (e.g., Mr. Bur’s Degranulation Kit for site prep) are available.

Practical Tips for Success Across Techniques

  • Site Prep: Thorough debridement is universal. Tools like Mr. Bur degranulation Kit ensures a clean bed, critical for FGG and CTG alike.

  • Precision: Fine burs (e.g., soft tissue trimming burs) refine grafts or flaps, reducing trauma — a must for all three methods.

  • Patient Care: Educate patients globally on avoiding smoking and maintaining hygiene post-op.

Tailoring the Approach to Your Patient

Choosing between free gingival grafts, pedicle grafts, and connective tissue grafts depends on the clinical scenario and patient needs. FGG offers robust tissue reinforcement, pedicle grafts excel in localized aesthetics, and CTG delivers the best of both worlds. By understanding their strengths and limitations, dentists can optimize outcomes worldwide. Explore high-quality tools—like those from Mr. Bur—to enhance precision and efficiency, ensuring every graft supports periodontal health for the long haul.

Working with experts over 50 years of experience in the dental bur industry, MR.BUR AUSTRALIA is dedicated to provide the highest quality dental burs on the market.

 

Diamond BursCarbide BursSurgical & Lab Use BursEndodontic bursIPR KitCrown Cutting KitGingivectomy KitRoot Planning KitOrthodontic KitComposite PolishersHigh Speed BursLow Speed Burs 

Mr Bur Home Page  All Products

 

Contact Us

More articles